The Increasing Frequency of Mass Shootings: The Disturbing Possibilities

Another shooting in Texas. How is this even possible? How is it that so many people are losing their minds and committing these atrocious mass murders? Are we witnessing a breakdown of the human psyche? Are people really snapping to the point where they can’t control their behavior, and feel the need to murder as many people as possible? According to the media, the United States has experienced 193 mass shootings this year alone. Is there something else going on? Something darker and much more sinister?

To understand the possible answers to this question one must first understand that as a society, we are being governed through the eyes of a technocratic elite. Those who believe in science, and view the human being as nothing more than another animal. In my article, When Science Deliberately Destroys God, I cited the paper The Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress, by Canadian Psychiatrist, Brock Chisolm. Presenting his work to the World Health Organization after World War II, he argued that traditional morality and a belief in a universal right and wrong were the biggest impediments to achieving global government. He stated that the work of psychologists and psychiatrists should be to eradicate these concepts while also stating that religious belief “is a dogma that prevents men from reasoning and enjoying their inclination to follow their natural urges.” What does this mean? Removing God from the equation may, in fact, return man to an animalistic state. In other words, religious morality, universal concepts of right and wrong, and the self-restraint that comes with them are what enable men to self-govern and maintain a civilized society. Theoretically speaking.

I also discussed B.F. Skinner and his role in creating a science of behavior. He essentially argued that such a science would be limited if concepts such as free will and personal responsibility were part of the equation. In Beyond Freedom and Dignity Skinner argued that when viewing man through a behavioral lens there are the pre-scientific and scientific views. The pre-scientific view posits the idea that men are indeed self-responsible individuals who are largely in control of their thoughts and behaviors. The scientific view assumes that the environment controls behavior, and once mastery of the environment is possible, control of man’s behavior would also be possible. This is because man is viewed as nothing but a stimulus-response animal in the eyes of behavioral science.

God, despite the majority of the nation identifying with some Christian denomination or another, has been eradicated from the public schools. He has been replaced by Darwinian evolution. Children are being taught that they are no different than an animal. Morality, concepts of truth existing as a universal constant, are social constructs meant to uphold the power of the dominant social group. Children are being taught they are either oppressed victims, hated simply for being an “other,” or that they are the oppressor. This alone is enough to turn a society inside out. There is absolutely no way that feelings of discontentment, isolation, and pure anger cannot develop in a nation where its youngest members are the target of what should be viewed as nothing less than political coercion. That is a nicer way of saying brainwashed.

Where does that leave us? Many people would argue that these shooters are themselves, brainwashed proxies programmed to commit these shootings. A Manchurian candidate type of individual many people believe to be the product of an experiment called MK Ultra. As conspiratorial of a topic as it is, there is evidence that it was real. According to an article entitled  Ethics of CIA and Military Contracting by Psychiatrists and Psychologists by Colin Ross, projects under the MK Ultra banner were contracted out as subprojects to psychiatrists and psychologists to study hypnosis, the implanting of false memories, and the creation of dissociative disorders through the use of LSD, sensory deprivation, and most likely, torture. Does this mean that they discovered how to program people to act against their own will and commit acts of mass murder? Not necessarily. A great deal is known about behavioral change though. According to a book called Psychology and Modern Warfare,  a person’s will can be altered to the point where they can become active participants in actions they would otherwise oppose to. What people need to understand is that behavior and behavioral change, for the purpose of gaining compliance, have been under the microscope since Pavlov’s experiments in Russia.

This information is significant because William Cooper, in his book Behold a Pale Horse, wrote that brainwashed proxies would be used to commit mass shootings in public schools, which in turn would create a demand from the public that the second amendment be eradicated. William Cooper was a conspiracy theorist who predicted the events of September 11, 2001. His radio broadcast the Hour of the Time was probably one of the most informative on the efforts to create a global government, the occult, and the attempts to brainwash the American public into acquiescence with the globalist’s objectives. On page 225 we wrote the following –

“The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well underway, and so far, is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment.” 

Is the government encouraging the manufacture and importation of military-style firearms? It wouldn’t appear so, however, this was written in 1991. I was only 18 then and had no idea what was going on in the world of gun control. Today, one has to wonder what is going on with so many states passing open carry laws, permitless carry laws and even the SCOTUS ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen is a little suspect. Looking at it through the prism of the above quote one has to wonder if what we are witnessing is the deliberate creation of a constitutional crisis. A dialectic framed between the extremes of absolute firearm freedom and gun control. Personally, I believe in the tenets of the second amendment but I also believe it requires responsibility. That is another topic, however. Whatever the case may be, it is perfectly clear that despite SCOTUS’ ruling, the left is willing to drive on with their agenda.

The next possibility may be a bit more disturbing. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) gave a pretty damning speech on the Senate floor, condemning the Biden administration’s attempts to redo the Iranian nuclear deal. She states that the Iranian regime has made explicit threats to infiltrate our nation and kill American citizens on our soil. Our borders are wide open. People from all over the world are crossing with ease as our government welcomes them in with open arms as if we owe them a living. A few weeks ago a disturbing video surfaced showing thousands of Chinese males entering our country. In the past, we have seen similar videos of military-aged males of Middle-Eastern origin entering with no families, no children, just men. People paying attention to these mass shootings know the controversial nature of how they are reported. There is often contradictory information, and in many cases, there are reports of people seeing more than one shooter. When the dust settles we are led to believe that it was either a mentally deranged individual or just some guy who snapped for no reason. What if they are foreign nationals working for the global cabal to disarm American citizens?

There is one thing that is undeniably true. The efforts to implement gun bans in the U.S. are global. The Chinese have demanded the U.S. implement gun control and of course, The United Nations, which wouldn’t exist without your money, is also pushing civilian disarmament. Is there a way out of it? Is it possible, for example, as many gun rights advocates are arguing, that SCOTUS is in the process of fully restoring gun rights? Justice Amy Barret has given the city of Naperville Illinois until Monday, May 8,  to justify why they think they can disregard their ruling. Naperville passed an assault weapon ban which was upheld by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, as it was on the state level as well. Why isn’t SCOTUS demanding the state explain its position? Who knows? Will SCOTUS enforce its rulings and force gun-controlling states to respect the second amendment? In a perfect world, sure.  It isn’t likely to happen. Not without major backlash anyway. The bottom line is this. Gun control is inevitable as long as they are able to portray a mass shooting taking place every day. The general public has been conditioned to live in a state of fear. Your children, under the direction of anti-gun educators, are being trained to not only fear firearms but to rely on other people to protect them. Unless we figure out a way to get ahead of the curve, it is only a matter of time, I’m afraid.


Leave a Comment


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)