Many conservatives believe that the Democrat party has been infiltrated by communists. Hard core leftists who are trying to spark a socialist revolution to unite the masses, dismantle capitalism, and overthrow America’s so-called, imperialist system. If you lean to the right and have been paying attention the past fifteen years or so, this would be a logical assessment. Since Barrack Obama, we have witnessed radical leftism on full display. Mass social movements have been organized to protest every little thing. It seems as if the entire Democrat party is made up of people who despise American values and would like nothing more than to see her demise. The Republican party, on the other hand, is commonly perceived as the party that stands for patriotism and the constitution by people on the right. Still, when they take the reins of power, nothing really changes, as they seem to push an agenda that is just as destructive. For instance, Republicans increase the national debt just as much as Democrats, push laws that are antithetical to liberty, and do the opposite of what they promise voters. Many Republicans, as an example, jumped on board The Bi-partisan Safer Communities Act, which is some of the most significant gun control legislation to come out of congress in some time. The question is; are we really living in a two-party system? Or is it deliberately set up that way to give the illusion of choice? Conservatives commonly accuse the Democrats of using something called the Hegelian Dialectic to push their agenda. Is it possible the entire system is based on this Marxist philosophy?
If conservatives believe that the Democrats have been taken over by communists, they should study, and accept, all aspects of communism. Not just the historical facts, but the philosophy and deceptive nature of it as well. While many people recognize it as an economic system, it is in truth, a methodical, almost scientific approach to changing the very nature of man. This is why it is so deceptive. If people knew that the intent was to change man’s nature so they are willing to give up the fruits of their labor to a communal system, no one would accept it. In a roundabout way, that is what happened. Marx and Engles envisioned a massive conflict between the proletariat and the bourgeoise that would not only bring an end to capitalism, but the state as well. In the end, this never materialized. What did happen, however, was the systematic murder of over sixty million people whose nature couldn’t be changed to align with the communist view. This number remains largely debated, and according to the Black Book of Communism, it is often excused, as it was done in the pursuit of a “better world for all mankind.” Communism, when compared to Nazism, killed far more people, but because the Nazi’s were driven by racial hatred, they were seen as more evil in the eyes of many. The communists were allegedly driven by the pursuit of total equality. No better way to show that than by murdering sixty million people, but I digress. The truth is Nazism and Communism are cut from the same cloth.
There is a common misperception that Nazism is a far-right ideology. Even the dictionary definition of the word fascism has been changed, under a radical leftist administration no less, to reflect this idea. Politically speaking, the further right you go on the scale, the less government there is. The further left, less freedom and more government control. Our constitution, and the system of limited government it was supposed to create, exists halfway between the far right and the center of the political scale. True right-wing extremism would be the complete absence of government. It could be argued “theoretically” that fascism is rightwing in the sense that it exists to the right of communism on the scale, but it is still far left of center.
To this day, few people realize how deceptive the communists were. For example, a common perception is that the Soviet Union was soundly defeated, and the fall of the Berlin Wall signified the end of communism. If you stop and think about it, that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny, as young minds in America seem to have been taken over by communist dogma. If an ideology of freedom prevailed, why is communist thought so prevalent in our country? According to Anatoliy Golitsyn, the Soviets were able to construct a massive communist network under the guise that the ideology had been beat. They were able to do this because the west believed they were not a threat. In essence, they were taking advantage of this belief. Golitsyn writes that the best deception often reflects the beliefs of those being deceived. They essentially feigned the creation of a capitalist system that was still under control of communist overseers. Another part of this deception is the fact that President Reagan, in 1985, signed the General Agreement between the U.S.A and the U.S.S.R. on Contacts, Exchanges and Cooperation in Scientific, Technical, Educational, Cultural and Other Fields. This was an agreement between the so-called, abolished Soviet Union, and the United States which in short, gave them influence over our education system. This is a fact that people should take seriously, as many of our young children are being indoctrinated into a worldview hostile to American values. This agreement at least provides a speculative answer as to how and why this is happening.
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? This is a system of thought, or argument, based on something called Dialectical Materialism. This was the philosophy of Georg Hegal that was adopted by Marx and Engles to describe their views on the laws of nature. Just as communists sought to change the nature of man, they sought to change the nature of everything in a way that justified their views. Conspiracy theorists recognize the Hegelian Dialectic as the problem-reaction-solution strategy that they mostly associate with the radical left. The government creates the problem, the public demands a solution, the government then offers one they have been wanting to implement. The theory of Dialectical Materialism itself, to put it simply, denotes the idea that all progress in the universe is the result of conflict. According to the book, The Naked Communist, Marx and Engles referred to this as the law of opposites. This concept essentially says everything in existence has an opposite. These two opposites clash with one another resulting in movement or progress. Think about the vitriolic nature of American politics a moment. We have a left vs. right paradigm representing views that are exact opposites. On the right, we have those who believe in constitutional government, the right to bear arms, free speech and the idea that we should be left to live our lives to the best of our abilities. On the left, it is the exact opposite. They work to discredit the constitution, push for gun control, hate free speech, and think government should be involved in every aspect of our lives. This is a constant conflict that seems real enough to the masses. However, the two parties always seem to find a way to advance an agenda of spending us into oblivion, restricting freedom, spying on us, and engaging in unconstitutional and unnecessary wars.
If you were to ask any American, they would surely understand the concept of divide and conquer, yet they fail to see it being played out in real time. Each party panders to the beliefs and attitudes of their respective voters, essentially telling them what they want to hear. Every election cycle becomes the most important of our lifetime as it becomes imperative for the party out of power, to vote out the party in power to save the country from whatever mess they created. It is a fabricated conflict where the Democrats think they are fighting fascism and the Republicans think they are fighting socialism. In reality, they are both working together to advance the nation towards totalitarian ends that in a roundabout way, they deceptively persuade you to beg for. It is a dialectical system based on the idea that progress comes from two opposing forces.
If you enjoyed this article, be sure to be looking out for my latest book, The Psychology of Persuasive Propaganda: The Things You Should Know. In the meantime, you can check out –
Without a Shot Indeed: Inducing Compliance to Tyranny Through Conditioning and Persuasion.
and A Critical Look at CRT in Education, Research and Social Policy
Copyright 2026
Property of David Risselada and defenseofournation.com
